How to Fill Business Process Functionality Gaps

What is a Functionality Gap?

Business process functionality gaps are the discrepancy between the desired or ideal capabilities of a business process and its current performance. They occur when a process fails to meet the needs or expectations of the organization, and can lead to inefficiencies, errors, or missed opportunities.

Large enterprise solutions, like those offered by ERP platforms, can offer broad-based solutions to companies that address many of their general business functions. What companies are finding, however, is that while these systems provide significant value, they also leave behind functionality gaps that may seem small but can have significant downstream impacts. Having the enterprise application provider or one of its consulting partners customize an application to fill these gaps can be cost-prohibitive and not offer the speed of deployment and cost/benefit ratios needed.

Key Components

In order to establish a functionality gap within your organization, there are a few different pieces that need to be identified:

  • Desired state: The ideal or target level of performance for the business process. This is often based on industry best practices, strategic objectives, or customer requirements.
  • Current state: The actual performance of the process, including its efficiency, effectiveness, and ability to meet goals.
  • Gap: The difference between the desired state and the current state.

Common Functionality Gap Causes

There are many reasons why an organization might have functionality gaps within its systems. They may exist due to a number of things, such as:

  • Outdated systems or processes: Legacy systems or outdated processes may not be able to support current business needs.
  • Lack of resources: Insufficient staffing, budget, or technology can hinder process performance.
  • Poor communication or collaboration: Ineffective communication or collaboration among team members can lead to errors and delays.
  • Inefficient workflows: Complex, redundant, or poorly designed workflows can create bottlenecks and inefficiencies.
  • Lack of standardization: Inconsistent practices or standards can make it difficult to achieve consistency and efficiency.

Identifying and Addressing Functionality Gaps

The process of identifying and addressing functionality gaps is key to filling them. Here are examples of what that process might look like for different organizations:

Identification

  • Process mapping: Visualizing the current process to identify areas of inefficiency or redundancy.
  • Root cause analysis: Determining the underlying causes of problems to address them effectively.
  • Benchmarking: Comparing the organization’s performance to industry best practices.
  • Performance metrics: Tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure process effectiveness.

Addressing

  • Process redesign: Rethinking and restructuring processes to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
  • Technology implementation: Investing in new technologies to enhance process capabilities.
  • Training and development: Providing training and development to improve employee skills and knowledge.
  • Continuous improvement: Implementing a culture of continuous improvement to identify and address ongoing issues.

Start Filling the Gaps

Targeted, cloud-hosted solutions can offer flexible and specific functionality to fill gaps in your processing environment or ERP. These bolt-on applications can be implemented rapidly without the slow and expensive customization to your legacy systems. Additionally, bolt-ons are beneficial because they don’t touch the actual ERP, meaning that updates and upgrades can be completed without any issues.

For over 30 years, ICG has provided solutions that address functionality gaps and fit in the odd-shaped business boxes that enterprise applications aren’t designed for. Whether it is a complex systems environment requiring multiple integrations or a challenging business process causing undo inefficiencies, large enterprise systems often require expensive and time-consuming customizations to address those “outside-of-the-box” issues.

If your organization has financial back-office systems and processes that don’t fit neatly in a box, ICG may be able to provide solutions that fill the gaps left by your enterprise applications. Contact ICG today for more information or request a demo of one of our world-class cloud-hosted solutions.

Posts you might like:

The Impact of AI on Back Office Operations

The financial back office encompasses numerous crucial, historically time-consuming tasks that are prone to human error; however, with the aid of AI, these tasks may no longer be considered bottlenecks. AI is fundamentally transforming financial back-office functions,...

Multifaceted ERPs vs. ICG’s Solutions

Choosing the right back-office solutions can feel like navigating a maze. For businesses looking to optimize their back-office operations, the decision may come down to two entirely different solutions: a comprehensive, multifaceted ERP system or a more agile,...

Solution for Non-Standard Invoices

Invoice processing can be a major drain on resources for finance and accounts payable teams, especially when dealing with invoices that don't conform to a standard template. Manually keying in data from these non-standard documents is time-consuming, prone to error,...

Using a Vendor Portal to Consolidate Systems

Is your AP team constantly fielding calls and emails from vendors asking about invoice status? Are you juggling multiple backend systems, trying to provide a clear picture of payment progress? If so, you're not alone. Many companies, especially those with several...

Out-of-the-Box Software vs. ICG Approach

Choosing the right back office technology is a critical decision for any organization. It can be the difference between streamlined, efficient operations and a mess of manual workarounds, half-working systems, and imperfect solutions. Financial back office technology...

What To Do About Vendor Fraud

Balancing fraud prevention with a user-friendly vendor experience is a critical challenge for businesses today. Striking the right balance between the two is essential, as you need to protect your company's finances without creating a vendor management process so...

Internal IT Build vs. ICG Innovations

When it comes to developing and implementing new technology and systems for your financial back office, a common question arises: Should we rely on our internal IT team, or explore external alternatives? There are compelling arguments for both approaches, and...

Dynamic Discounting and Budgeting Season

Budgeting season is a critical time for all businesses, but particularly within the financial back office. It's a period of intense scrutiny, forecasting, and strategic planning. The pressure is on when it comes to saving money, and creating more value from the...

Choosing the Right Technology: AI

With technology becoming more and more advanced, keeping up with the trends is no longer enough for companies to thrive. Instead, businesses must stay on the leading edge, and that means embracing AI in the financial back office. If you haven't already started...

Configuration vs. Customization

When your financial institution is looking to implement new back-office systems, whether it's for accounts payable, general ledger, or expense management, you'll inevitably encounter a fundamental decision: Should we configure an existing solution, or opt for deep...