How to Fill Business Process Functionality Gaps

What is a Functionality Gap?

Business process functionality gaps are the discrepancy between the desired or ideal capabilities of a business process and its current performance. They occur when a process fails to meet the needs or expectations of the organization, and can lead to inefficiencies, errors, or missed opportunities.

Large enterprise solutions like ERP platforms offer broad-based solutions to companies that address many of their general business functions. What companies are finding, however, is that while these systems provide significant value, they also leave behind functionality gaps that may seem small but can have significant downstream impacts. Having the enterprise application provider or one of its consulting partners customize an application to fill these gaps can be cost-prohibitive and not offer the speed of deployment and cost/benefit ratios needed.

Key Components

To establish a functionality gap within your organization, there are a few different pieces that need to be identified:

  • Desired state: The ideal or target level of performance for the business process. This is often based on industry best practices, strategic objectives, or customer requirements.
  • Current state: The actual performance of the process, including its efficiency, effectiveness, and ability to meet goals.
  • Gap: The difference between the desired state and the current state.

Common Functionality Gap Causes

There are many reasons why an organization might have functionality gaps within its systems. They may exist due to a number of things, such as:

  • Outdated systems or processes: Legacy systems or outdated processes may not be able to support current business needs.
  • Lack of resources: Insufficient staffing, budget, or technology can hinder process performance.
  • Poor communication or collaboration: Ineffective communication or collaboration among team members can lead to errors and delays.
  • Inefficient workflows: Complex, redundant, or poorly designed workflows can create bottlenecks and inefficiencies.
  • Lack of standardization: Inconsistent practices or standards can make it difficult to achieve consistency and efficiency.

Identifying and Addressing Functionality Gaps

The process of identifying and addressing functionality gaps is key to filling them. Here are examples of what that process might look like for different organizations:

Identification

  • Process mapping: Visualizing the current process to identify areas of inefficiency or redundancy.
  • Root cause analysis: Determining the underlying causes of problems to address them effectively.
  • Benchmarking: Comparing the organization’s performance to industry best practices.
  • Performance metrics: Tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure process effectiveness.

Addressing

  • Process redesign: Rethinking and restructuring processes to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
  • Technology implementation: Investing in new technologies to enhance process capabilities.
  • Training and development: Providing training and development to improve employee skills and knowledge.
  • Continuous improvement: Implementing a culture of continuous improvement to identify and address ongoing issues.

Start Filling the Gaps

Targeted, cloud-hosted solutions can offer flexible and specific functionality to fill gaps in your processing environment or ERP. These bolt-on applications can be implemented rapidly without the slow and expensive customization to your legacy systems. Additionally, bolt-ons are beneficial because they don’t touch the actual ERP, meaning that updates and upgrades can be completed without any issues.

Bolt On Benefits
Bolt On Benefits

For over 30 years, ICG has provided solutions that address functionality gaps and fit in the odd-shaped business boxes that enterprise applications aren’t designed for. Whether it is a complex systems environment requiring multiple integrations or a challenging business process causing undue inefficiencies, large enterprise systems often require expensive and time-consuming customizations to address those “outside-of-the-box” issues.

If your organization has financial back-office systems and processes that don’t fit neatly in a box, ICG may be able to provide solutions that fill the gaps left by your enterprise applications. Contact ICG today for more information or request a demo of one of our world-class cloud-hosted solutions.

Posts you might like:

How to Decrease Administrative Work in the Financial Back Office

If your back-office team spends 80% of their time chasing missing invoices and fixing typos, you're both losing money on operational inefficiencies and also burning out your talent while missing out on strategic insights. Reducing administrative work in the financial...

The Importance of Considering All Back Office Stakeholders

When a leadership team decides to upgrade its back-office technology, the focus is usually on efficiency metrics, ROI, and cost reduction. But there's a difference between choosing software that looks great during a demo and choosing software that actually succeeds in...

Vendor Portal Technology FAQs

Mid-market companies and large enterprises alike face increasing pressure to scale their supply chains while driving down operational costs. This has made the financial back office primary target for digital transformation. At the center of this modernization effort...

How IDP Transforms the Financial Back Office

In the financial sector, efficiency is an incredibly competitive metric. When financial institutions look at Intelligent Document Processing or IDP, they often view it through a narrow lens: How much time will this save us on invoice processing? How much faster can we...

How to Build a Strong AP Approvals Process

What is an AP approvals process? An Accounts Payable approvals process is a rules-based workflow that determines how a vendor invoice is reviewed, verified, and finally authorized for payment. Building an effective AP approval workflow for your organization requires...

Bolt-on Software Integration vs. Complete System Replacement

What is the difference between a bolt-on software integration and a complete system replacement? A bolt-on is technology that layers directly onto an existing ERP system to enhance its capabilities without altering its core database. Conversely, a complete system...

AP Automation Implementation Challenges

The promise of accounts payable automation is undeniable: lower processing costs, fewer manual errors, faster cycle times, and the ability to turn a traditional cost center into a strategic, data-driven asset. However, deciding to automate is only the first step. The...

7 Things to Look for in an Accounts Payable Solution

Choosing the right accounts payable automation solution is key to the success of the department. As the global AP automation market is projected to reach $6.57 billion this year, organizations are now doing more than just using digital invoices. Now, it's a race...

6 Vendor Onboarding Best Practices

Vendor onboarding is a critical security and operational gateway. With supply chains becoming more interconnected and regulatory scrutiny reaching an all-time high, how you onboard a vendor determines the health of the entire partnership. If your onboarding process...

Key Accounts Payable KPIs for Financial Health

Accounts Payable is a wealth of data that, when managed correctly, protects cash flow and strengthens vendor relationships. To ensure that AP is strategic, it is important to track accounts payable KPIs to monitor how your department is doing. Here are the essential...