Internal IT Build vs. ICG Innovations

When it comes to developing and implementing new technology and systems for your financial back office, a common question arises: Should we rely on our internal IT team, or explore external alternatives? There are compelling arguments for both approaches, and understanding the pros and cons is crucial for making the right decision.

The financial back office is the operational heartbeat of your institution. It’s where critical processes like accounts payable, vendor management, reconciliation, and compliance reside. The systems supporting these functions need to be robust, secure, and highly efficient. So, let’s explore what it means to entrust these vital technological endeavors to your in-house IT department.

The Pros of Working with Your Internal IT Team

There’s a lot to be said for leveraging the talent already within your organization:

  • Deep Institutional Knowledge: Your internal IT team has an intimate understanding of your company’s unique culture, existing infrastructure, historical data, and specific operational nuances. This deep knowledge can be invaluable in designing systems that truly fit your organization’s needs.
  • Faster Communication and Collaboration: Being in the same building or ecosystem fosters quicker communication and seamless collaboration with other departments. This can lead to faster problem-solving and a more agile development process.
  • Tailored Solutions and Customization: An internal team can build highly customized solutions that precisely address your specific requirements, without compromises. They have direct control over the development roadmap.
  • Enhanced Security and Control: With an in-house team, you maintain direct control over data security protocols, intellectual property, and system access. This can provide a greater sense of security for sensitive financial data.
  • Cultural Alignment: Your internal IT staff are already integrated into your company’s values and mission, potentially leading to a stronger commitment to long-term goals and a better cultural fit for the technology they create.

The Cons of Working with Your Internal IT Team

While the benefits are significant, there are also notable challenges:

  • High Costs: Building and maintaining an in-house development team is expensive. Beyond salaries and benefits, you’ll incur costs for recruitment, ongoing training, software licenses, hardware, and office space. These fixed costs can be substantial, regardless of project volume.
  • Limited Specialized Expertise: Your internal IT team might be proficient in maintaining existing systems, but potentially lacking deep, specialized expertise in cutting-edge financial back office technologies like advanced automation, AI-driven data capture, or complex vendor portal development. Niche skills might require costly external training or new hires.
  • Time-Consuming and Resource-Intensive: Developing complex financial systems from scratch requires significant time and resources. The internal team may already be stretched thin, leading to project delays or a strain on existing operations.
  • Scalability Challenges: If your business experiences rapid growth or seasonal fluctuations, scaling an internal IT team up or down can be slow and expensive. Hiring and onboarding new talent takes time, and you might face periods of overstaffing or understaffing.
  • Risk of Knowledge Silos and Dependency: If only a few internal team members possess critical knowledge about a system, their departure can create significant operational vulnerabilities and knowledge gaps.
  • Focus Diversion from Core Business: Your internal IT team’s primary focus should ideally be on supporting your core business operations. Diverting significant resources to large-scale system development can pull them away from other critical functions.

Exploring Alternatives

For many institutions, a blend of deep institutional knowledge and specialized external expertise can be the most effective path.

If your internal IT team is stretched thin, lacks specific expertise in areas like advanced automation or intelligent document processing, or if you’re looking for a faster time-to-market with proven solutions, exploring external alternatives is a smart move.

This is where companies like ICG Innovations come in. We offer a compelling alternative by providing specialized, cloud-hosted solutions for financial back-office processes. Our solutions integrate seamlessly with your existing ERP, offering a configurable, modular, and secure approach that leverages decades of experience.

Choosing the right approach for your financial back office technology is a strategic decision. By carefully weighing the pros and cons of internal development against the benefits of specialized external partners, you can ensure your operations are powered by the most efficient, secure, and future-ready systems available. To learn more, request a free demo from ICG.

Posts you might like:

How Back-Office Chatbots Fuel Data-Driven Decisions

While chatbots are mostly known to be used for customer service, their potential within the financial and operational back office is rapidly growing. They're emerging as powerful tools for accessing, analyzing, and ultimately driving data-driven decision-making within...

The Impact of AI on Back Office Operations

The financial back office encompasses numerous crucial, historically time-consuming tasks that are prone to human error; however, with the aid of AI, these tasks may no longer be considered bottlenecks. AI is fundamentally transforming financial back-office functions,...

Multifaceted ERPs vs. ICG’s Solutions

Choosing the right back-office solutions can feel like navigating a maze. For businesses looking to optimize their back-office operations, the decision may come down to two entirely different solutions: a comprehensive, multifaceted ERP system or a more agile,...

Solution for Non-Standard Invoices

Invoice processing can be a major drain on resources for finance and accounts payable teams, especially when dealing with invoices that don't conform to a standard template. Manually keying in data from these non-standard documents is time-consuming, prone to error,...

Using a Vendor Portal to Consolidate Systems

Is your AP team constantly fielding calls and emails from vendors asking about invoice status? Are you juggling multiple backend systems, trying to provide a clear picture of payment progress? If so, you're not alone. Many companies, especially those with several...

Out-of-the-Box Software vs. ICG Approach

Choosing the right back office technology is a critical decision for any organization. It can be the difference between streamlined, efficient operations and a mess of manual workarounds, half-working systems, and imperfect solutions. Financial back office technology...

What To Do About Vendor Fraud

Balancing fraud prevention with a user-friendly vendor experience is a critical challenge for businesses today. Striking the right balance between the two is essential, as you need to protect your company's finances without creating a vendor management process so...

Dynamic Discounting and Budgeting Season

Budgeting season is a critical time for all businesses, but particularly within the financial back office. It's a period of intense scrutiny, forecasting, and strategic planning. The pressure is on when it comes to saving money, and creating more value from the...

Choosing the Right Technology: AI

With technology becoming more and more advanced, keeping up with the trends is no longer enough for companies to thrive. Instead, businesses must stay on the leading edge, and that means embracing AI in the financial back office. If you haven't already started...

Configuration vs. Customization

When your financial institution is looking to implement new back-office systems, whether it's for accounts payable, general ledger, or expense management, you'll inevitably encounter a fundamental decision: Should we configure an existing solution, or opt for deep...