Costs of Manual Vendor Onboarding

Although manual onboarding has long been the most common, albeit time-consuming, form of vendor onboarding, its simplicity may be doing organizations a disservice. Manual vendor onboarding processes come with several inherent risks and numerous hidden and potentially significant costs that organizations should be aware of. These risks can impact the efficiency, accuracy, total cost, and overall effectiveness of an onboarding process. Here are some common risks and hidden costs associated with manual vendor onboarding:

Common Risks

Errors and Inconsistencies

Manual data entry increases the likelihood of errors and inconsistencies. Typos, misinterpretations, or oversight can lead to inaccuracies in vendor information, consequently causing problems in the future and increasing an organization’s risk. A small error can lead to much bigger issues, such as:

  • Losing vendor trust
  • Missing out on discounts
  • Reputational damage
  • Not to mention, many mistakes can build up over time to create a larger impact.

Compliance Issues

Manual processes may struggle to keep up with changing regulatory requirements. Non-compliance with industry regulations or legal standards can result in fines, legal action, and damage to the organization’s reputation. A small mistake or expired certification can cause issues much larger than they may seem.

Risk Management

Manual processes rely on individuals and manual “systems” to track insurance expirations and other compliance-related deadlines, resulting in large financial liabilities for non-compliance or uncovered incidents. While these systems may seem accurate, risks are constantly changing over time and should be constantly updated.

Slow Processing Time

Manual onboarding tends to be slower than automated processes. Delays in vendor onboarding can hinder business operations, especially when quick access to goods or services is crucial to your business. Additionally, vendors may not want to work with your organization if your onboarding process is too complex or takes too long.

Lack of Visibility

Manual processes often lack transparency and real-time visibility for both internal and external users. This can make it challenging to track the status of vendor onboarding, monitor progress, and identify bottlenecks or issues promptly. It also generates unneeded calls and emails from suppliers who lack visibility into where they stand in the process.

Security Concerns

Physical paperwork and manual filing systems may pose security risks, such as unauthorized access to sensitive vendor information. Data breaches can lead to financial losses and damage to the organization’s reputation. Additionally, being unaware of potential high-risk vendors can cause security concerns as well.

Difficulty in Scaling

As the number of vendors grows, managing manual onboarding becomes increasingly challenging. The process may become cumbersome, inefficient, and difficult to scale without a proportional increase in resources and the costs associated with those resources. If your organization is in a growth mode, the inability to bring on new vendors into the supply chain rapidly and efficiently may hinder growth and eventually cause downstream issues.

Dependency on Key Individuals

If key individuals responsible for manual onboarding leave the organization or are unavailable, it can lead to disruptions and delays. There may be a lack of institutional knowledge about specific vendors or processes.

Inefficient Communication

Manual communication channels, such as emails and phone calls, may result in delays and miscommunication. This can lead to misunderstandings between the organization and vendors, affecting the relationship.

Limited Audit Trail

Manual processes often lack a comprehensive audit trail, making it challenging to trace changes, identify problem areas, or access historical data. This can be a problem in case of disputes or the need for retrospective analysis.

Vendor Experience

Cumbersome manual processes may negatively impact the vendor experience. Complicated onboarding procedures may deter potential vendors, and existing vendors may become frustrated with time-consuming requirements. Manual and outdated onboarding processes send the message to the vendor community that your organization is not operating efficiently.

Computer with a checkmark by a vendor profile representing vendor onboarding

Costs and Resource Intensiveness

Manual onboarding is resource-intensive, requiring significant time and effort from staff. The associated labor costs, the potential for errors, and the need for physical storage space can contribute to higher operational expenses. It is also costly and resource-intensive for your vendors and suppliers, and those costs may be passed along in the goods and services you purchase from them.

Learn More

To mitigate these risks and lower the costs of operating in a manual environment, organizations can consider transitioning to automated or semi-automated vendor onboarding processes. Automating the vendor onboarding process through a vendor portal-based onboarding solution offers improved efficiency, accuracy, compliance, vendor experience, risk management, cost savings, scalability, and standardization. These benefits contribute to higher levels of productivity, enhanced vendor relationships, and a competitive advantage for your business.

If your company has not already invested in a portal-based, automated vendor onboarding system, you may be putting your company at a disadvantage. Contact ICG to discuss how your organization can implement a vendor portal for your organization, or to schedule a demo of one of ICG’s comprehensive vendor portal or vendor onboarding solutions. You can also watch this video on ICG’s back-office solutions.

Posts you might like:

How to Decrease Administrative Work in the Financial Back Office

If your back-office team spends 80% of their time chasing missing invoices and fixing typos, you're both losing money on operational inefficiencies and also burning out your talent while missing out on strategic insights. Reducing administrative work in the financial...

The Importance of Considering All Back Office Stakeholders

When a leadership team decides to upgrade its back-office technology, the focus is usually on efficiency metrics, ROI, and cost reduction. But there's a difference between choosing software that looks great during a demo and choosing software that actually succeeds in...

Vendor Portal Technology FAQs

Mid-market companies and large enterprises alike face increasing pressure to scale their supply chains while driving down operational costs. This has made the financial back office primary target for digital transformation. At the center of this modernization effort...

How IDP Transforms the Financial Back Office

In the financial sector, efficiency is an incredibly competitive metric. When financial institutions look at Intelligent Document Processing or IDP, they often view it through a narrow lens: How much time will this save us on invoice processing? How much faster can we...

How to Build a Strong AP Approvals Process

What is an AP approvals process? An Accounts Payable approvals process is a rules-based workflow that determines how a vendor invoice is reviewed, verified, and finally authorized for payment. Building an effective AP approval workflow for your organization requires...

Bolt-on Software Integration vs. Complete System Replacement

What is the difference between a bolt-on software integration and a complete system replacement? A bolt-on is technology that layers directly onto an existing ERP system to enhance its capabilities without altering its core database. Conversely, a complete system...

AP Automation Implementation Challenges

The promise of accounts payable automation is undeniable: lower processing costs, fewer manual errors, faster cycle times, and the ability to turn a traditional cost center into a strategic, data-driven asset. However, deciding to automate is only the first step. The...

7 Things to Look for in an Accounts Payable Solution

Choosing the right accounts payable automation solution is key to the success of the department. As the global AP automation market is projected to reach $6.57 billion this year, organizations are now doing more than just using digital invoices. Now, it's a race...

6 Vendor Onboarding Best Practices

Vendor onboarding is a critical security and operational gateway. With supply chains becoming more interconnected and regulatory scrutiny reaching an all-time high, how you onboard a vendor determines the health of the entire partnership. If your onboarding process...

Key Accounts Payable KPIs for Financial Health

Accounts Payable is a wealth of data that, when managed correctly, protects cash flow and strengthens vendor relationships. To ensure that AP is strategic, it is important to track accounts payable KPIs to monitor how your department is doing. Here are the essential...