Workflow & Process Automation

Workflow and process automation are an ongoing part of the business in most organizations. Companies are continuously looking for ways to improve internal and external processes to accomplish many goals. Here are some examples of goals that workflow and process automation might help meet:

  • Increased customer service
  • Smooth out supply chains
  • Reduced internal costs
  • Improved vendor communications/relations
  • Manage cash flow more efficiently
  • Eliminate non-value-add tasks

Process automation is enabled by technology that performs tasks previously performed by human resources at a higher cost. The functionality available through most ERP packages and technology allows companies to convert largely manual, resource-intensive processes into automated tasks. Taking laborious human activities out of processes and replacing those manual activities with technology-based automation provides substantial benefits.

What is workflow management?

Workflow management, also known as business process management, is key to getting information to the right people at the right time. This allows them to make timely decisions based on the information received. The first step, as we have discussed, is to automate and streamline business processes. Next, workflow management takes that a huge step further. While process automation makes the information available to decision-makers faster, the workflow component ensures all the stakeholders will get the information, or a piece of the information, that they need to make decisions.

Applying process automation to AP functions like document and data capture, vendor inquiries, disputes, web-based invoice submission, vendor onboarding, or many other sub-processes can deliver significant savings. Utilizing tools such as vendor portals, dynamic discounting, PO flip, and OCR can offer even greater efficiencies and savings. However, the real win occurs when workflow management utilizes a rules-based approach.

A rules-based approach to workflow, while more complicated to implement, delivers greater benefits over the long run than a manual or email-based workflow system. In a rules-based workflow configuration, the AP automation system, through communication with the financial system of record and recognition of header-level data, will determine the characteristics of the payment and route that information to one or more of the appropriate parties.

Rules-Based Approach Example

For instance, a construction invoice for $2,000,000 routes much differently and is likely sent to more than one person for review and approval, compared to a services invoice for $500, which may only require one person to review and approve. Routing rules may be established based on a “delegation of authority,” which outlines approval authority based on many criteria, most importantly invoice total. In the example above, the delegation of authority requires the approval of a senior VP-level executive, as well as a line of business executive and a financial executive, before going to the ERP for payment. Other criteria evaluated to determine workflow routes are commodity or service, location, general ledger charging department, etc.

PO Invoices

In the case of a PO-based invoice, the workflow system will gather data from the financial system, AP application, and any other relevant systems, such as inventory or materials management, and attempt to do a 2, 3, or 4-way match. In the case of a three-way match, the workflow system may look for a match from invoice>receiver>purchase order. If there is a match, the workflow system feeds the results to the ERP to initiate the payment without human intervention. The receiver closes out, inventory levels adjust, and a deduction to the purchase order reflects the goods received.

Unsuccessful 3-Way Match

If a three-way match is unsuccessful, the workflow system routes the information to a worker to determine the nature of the mismatch. Again, the rules governing the nature of the product/service and the area of mismatch will determine the workflow route. For example, if the mismatch is an out-of-tolerance pricing discrepancy, the work item may be routed to the purchasing department. They may contact the supplier or decide whether to accept or not. In the event the mismatch is due to a unit of measure issue, like a liquid coming in quart containers when the PO specifies gallons, the ordering party may be the route destination, so they can decide if the shipment should be accepted as is or declined.

Conclusion

There are many different scenarios in a workflow and process automation management system. If implementing a well-thought-out design, information will flow rapidly throughout the enterprise to the proper individuals. These workflow management systems can also be configured to account for many different “out-of-the-ordinary” situations. For instance, escalations can be established if someone in the flow is not responding promptly or someone in the workflow is unavailable due to vacation or other extended absences. Finally, workflow participants can participate via mobile devices.

If you want to learn how your company can benefit from process automation or a robust workflow management system, contact ICG. We can show you and your team what is possible. Request a demo of ICG’s process automation and workflow management solutions.

Posts you might like:

The Impact of AI on Back Office Operations

The financial back office encompasses numerous crucial, historically time-consuming tasks that are prone to human error; however, with the aid of AI, these tasks may no longer be considered bottlenecks. AI is fundamentally transforming financial back-office functions,...

Multifaceted ERPs vs. ICG’s Solutions

Choosing the right back-office solutions can feel like navigating a maze. For businesses looking to optimize their back-office operations, the decision may come down to two entirely different solutions: a comprehensive, multifaceted ERP system or a more agile,...

Solution for Non-Standard Invoices

Invoice processing can be a major drain on resources for finance and accounts payable teams, especially when dealing with invoices that don't conform to a standard template. Manually keying in data from these non-standard documents is time-consuming, prone to error,...

Using a Vendor Portal to Consolidate Systems

Is your AP team constantly fielding calls and emails from vendors asking about invoice status? Are you juggling multiple backend systems, trying to provide a clear picture of payment progress? If so, you're not alone. Many companies, especially those with several...

Out-of-the-Box Software vs. ICG Approach

Choosing the right back office technology is a critical decision for any organization. It can be the difference between streamlined, efficient operations and a mess of manual workarounds, half-working systems, and imperfect solutions. Financial back office technology...

What To Do About Vendor Fraud

Balancing fraud prevention with a user-friendly vendor experience is a critical challenge for businesses today. Striking the right balance between the two is essential, as you need to protect your company's finances without creating a vendor management process so...

Internal IT Build vs. ICG Innovations

When it comes to developing and implementing new technology and systems for your financial back office, a common question arises: Should we rely on our internal IT team, or explore external alternatives? There are compelling arguments for both approaches, and...

Dynamic Discounting and Budgeting Season

Budgeting season is a critical time for all businesses, but particularly within the financial back office. It's a period of intense scrutiny, forecasting, and strategic planning. The pressure is on when it comes to saving money, and creating more value from the...

Choosing the Right Technology: AI

With technology becoming more and more advanced, keeping up with the trends is no longer enough for companies to thrive. Instead, businesses must stay on the leading edge, and that means embracing AI in the financial back office. If you haven't already started...

Configuration vs. Customization

When your financial institution is looking to implement new back-office systems, whether it's for accounts payable, general ledger, or expense management, you'll inevitably encounter a fundamental decision: Should we configure an existing solution, or opt for deep...